Thoughts
The paradox of Thiel's 0 to 1 thinking is that you have to be willing to think outside the box in other areas in order to find a 0 to 1
improvement. Thiel's argument is that the 0 to 1 change is what's important, and while it is important, I don't think you can have that fundamental change without also having a bunch of other smaller changes. The Macintosh wouldn't have succeeded without the mouse, but you can't stick a mouse on a 1980s windows computer and have a Macintosh.