Thoughts
Fedora has failed the "do not personally insult the developers of open source software" challenge.
=> https://pagure.io/fedora-workstation/issue/463#comment-955412 OBS maintainer joins the conversation here.
The quotes that I object to:
> One of the arguments in favor of Fedora Flatpaks is that Flathub maintainers [the upstream maintainer] are sometimes just bad at maintaining their packages, and, well... suffice to say I'm quite surprised we need to debate whether it's acceptable to use an EOL runtime that no longer receives security updates.
> keeping up with runtime updates is one of the most basic expectations of a maintainer, and I suspect it's a sign there may be other problems as well.
> I won't mince words: allowing the runtime to go EOL is unacceptable and indicates terrible maintainership.
I want to know if this person is familiar with OBS or not. OBS is one of the only open source applications that is so good that it has no competitors to speak of. If you don't use OBS you use Streamlabs (a fork of OBS). Coming for OBS is such an insane out-of-touch position.
Debian has previously failed this challenge:
=> https://thoughts.learnerpages.com/?show=2d159960-5e6b-48bc-bf6c-82bbd86c7ff5