Thoughts

Reporting bugs of this nature is just such a nightmare because I don't have the context to understand the browser internals at all, so I can't even imagine what part of the renderer is failing. When you hover over the element in the inspector the little highlighted box is (correctly) 18px tall right next to the label that says it's 19.2px.

Pretty much all I’ve had to eat today are muffins (3 and a half), a banana, some Pringle’s. Yesterday I had green beans and Mac and cheese, maybe some chocolate. Maybe I’m allergic to chocolate. I have been drinking lemonade this week, that’s definitely still on the table. I had seafood and a baked potato two nights ago, and a regular rotation of snacks (cheese it’s), but no nuts for at least a week. I did have a couple strawberries on Wednesday.

I need them to turn on the air conditioning in here. I can't handle it.

Praise God from whom all blessings flow!

Okay so there's such a thing as government bonds. Basically, you give the government $100 now, they give you $105 in a year. The percent increase is called the yield (5% in this example). The other variable is time. Is the government going to give you your money back in 1 year or 10 years. And other people can issue bonds, not just the government, but "the yield curve" refers to US treasury bonds. So what is it? Well, it's a graph of the yield versus the holding time. See, normally you want your back sooner—this gives you more flexibility. (You'd rather have $105 in 1 year (5%) than $150 in 10 years (5%). (I'm assuming no compound interest, so this is wrong, but it means I can do the numbers in my head.)) To compensate for this, you normally get a better yield rate if investing for longer periods of time. So instead of getting $150 in ten years, you might get $155 (5.5%). So the yield curve has time on the X axis, and %-return on the Y axis. In 2022, the yield curve inverted. This means that instead of getting better rates for longer amounts of time, you get worse rates. As of writing, the best rates are 2-months (5.5%) and if you give your money away for 10 years, a longer period, you get a worse rate (4.39%). This is like they're playing hot potato with the money. 'yeah I'll take it for 2 years but I don't want to be stuck with your money for 10 years.' Like what; I'll take your money for 10 years and invest it in short term bonds and take the difference I don't know. I'm not an economist so I don't understand why this is happening. I thought it was a fluke resulting from high interest rates in 2022 and expected it to correct itself but it hasn't. I also have no idea what the implications of this are.

*pleading* I just want to feel something. If I ever try to tell you that I’m a good driver, I’m lying.

changing people's minds, you can't hope for that outcome. You have to make your argument as well as you can, and then give the person space. If you've made your arguments well, and if you're right, then the person will eventually change their mind—but they will insist you weren't the reason. They might go do some research themselves to confirm that what you're saying is true, and then the facts will convince them. Maybe the next time they talk to someone else about the issue they won't use a point that you've refuted. Maybe if you talk to them again in a year, they'll deny ever disagreeing with you. But people's minds don't change quickly.

Edit: "This is only tangentially related...Relatively recently I did ketamine infusion therapy"

modified or deleted in the environment beforehand"

-ANTIFRAGILE, LE SSERAFIM

=> https://thoughts.learnerpages.com/?show=897ab74f-4449-4c87-90fe-b229e3fd1a3f

a hash with the key `:bar` and the value as the value of the method/variable. `foo(:one, two:)` is valid Ruby but `foo(one:, :two)` is a syntax error (implicit hashes need to be the last argument to a function). `foo :one, two: :three, four:` is syntax sugar for `foo(:one, { :two => :three, :four => four })`

“Sing to the sky” has always had a religious ring to it, but I for some reason hadn’t read the “you” in the song as God—despite lyrics like “hide my soul when you’re the only one who knows it.”

-Faith Enough, Jars of Clay “While you’re doing fine there’s some people and I who have a really tough time getting through this life, so excuse us while we sing to the sky” -Screen, twenty one pilots > “I brought my son to your disciples, but they could not heal him.” > “You unbelieving and perverse generation. Bring the boy here to me.” Jesus rebuked the demon, and it came out of the boy, and he was healed at that moment. > Then the disciples came to Jesus in private and asked, “Why weren’t we able to drive out the demon?” > Jesus replied, “Because you have so little faith. Truly, if you have faith as small as a mustard seed, you could say to this mountain, ‘Move from here to there,’ and it would move. Nothing would be impossible for you” Matthew 17:16-20, paraphrased

posting and laughing. That has to still be happening somewhere on the internet, maybe in some corner of TikTok, but I don’t know how to find it.

I can’t fricking handle it. If I workout I’m vain and I’m a jock. If I don’t eat dinner every night I have an eating disorder. If I eat unhealthy meals some nights I’m a glutton. If I don’t work out then I’m out of shape and fat. I just don’t know. I’ve never worried about my image this much before and now I’m fricking going insane. I can’t take it. I’m just so bored and there aren’t any goals in my life. I have no friends. And everyone else hates me more than I hate myself. If I don’t ask about people’s personal lives than I’m detached and phyociopatic but I do ask about people’s personal lives I’m a creep. And I can’t even be like “oh no one thinks you’re a creep” because 1) I think I’m a creep and 2) people would think I was a creep. Edit: yeah. I need to go to sleep. I’m just so angry and I have nothing to be angry at because being angry is morally wrong always (fact check: Jesus temple). I wish God would eat me and replace me with a perfect person. I used to not have code friends and then I had code friends but no personal friends but I judged the code friends for not being personal enough and I judged the personal friends for not being code enough and now I have no friends. I don’t know, I don’t do imperfect people. You must be perfect to be my friend but that’s hypocritical so I must become perfect myself and then I can join with perfect friend club with all the other perfect friends. :D

her to telepathically mutilate guest's bodies and trapped them in a city as part of an experiment.

about the fantasy parts of relationships. I’ve said before that I’m unwilling to lower my standards, but maybe it’s not about lowering my standards, maybe it’s about not wanting or not valuing *the part* of a fantasy relationship that I do. I’m always going to want that perfect relationship, but maybe I can have the most important parts of perfection instead of the most attractive parts.

So there would be a free tier, but hopefully 70-80% of MAU would be paying. The consequences to that seem pretty obvious to me. The site would be small and would stay small. So your costs would go down. You could afford to pay a couple of devs. You could look at decreasing the cost or increasing the number of free posts according to your actual costs. You could implement gifting subscriptions either to an individual or to the community like Twitch, or some other sort of "gleaning". Anyone can sign up, anyone can still read posts. This would put you in the "small amount of money from a large amount of people" area. And this has been proven to work because Are.na has been doing it for years (200 free posts, $7/month for unlimited posts, 4 full time employees, 15,000 paying users). (Cohost for contrast is seeing 30,000 monthly active users, <3,000 paying, and they're trying to support 4 full time employees.) The reason I don't foresee Cohost's current plans working out is this line: "the best way for us to make up for our deficit is to have more active users. the best way to have more active users is to make cohost better." I don't even know where to start with this because it's just wrong. 1. more active users will increase costs (on paper this isn't true, but in practice it is). 2. users don't move to a platform because it's better / users will use even a bad platform if there's a reason to. 3. Cohost's primary audience is gay Luddite furries, which is a limited number of potential users. 5. Cohost's UX is already better than every other social media site 6. Cohost's interface is a Tumblr clone which is extremely confusing if you've never used Tumblr before.

costs out of a moral disagreement with Cloudflare's executive team. They're losing 14k a month and their goal is to "bring the deficit down below $10k" (quote taken out of context I'm sorry) and they're spending 5k a month on CDN fees after moving off of a free Cloudflare plan. Someone help me budget this. The kicker is that it was a free Cloudflare plan. Like man you're really sticking it to Cloudflare by not not paying them anymore. Edit (9:08pm): I don't even know if this is up to date; it might not be true anymore. The H1 2023 report showed $10k in hosting/operations costs and expenses of $46k / month. The most recent report shows $34k in expenses (not broken down). So they've cut expenses somewhere. I don't think this is the real issue it's just funny. => https://cohost.org/staff/post/5023717-march-2024-financial March 2024 update => https://duckduckgo.com/?t=ffab&q=Cohost+H1+2023+Financial+Update H1 2023 update

users. You can't take a small amount of money from a small percentage of users. I was randomly browsing someone's mastodon the other day and they mentioned how nonsensical Cohost's financials were, and I felt validated that I wasn't the only one who failed to make sense of them.

mental illness and that's not something I say lightly.

re-opening a file' and adds that feature. 'it's dumb that Sublime doesn't have a word count.' Well, Formatter now does that too.

Framework doesn't ship with Linux. You have to install it yourself. I've installed Linux ~10 times on various computers, so I'm capable of doing it. (I'm not a pro.) It would be really fricking cool if I didn't have to—it's a chore. And I expect the option to not have to do it myself.

but there aren't any linux laptops there.

that I never managed to get the fingerprint reader working' Like what?

> donate hardware and cloud resources to enable use of the monorepo crying

reference. I've spent a little bit of time trying to figure out what types my own variables should be, but I've spent a lot of time trying to figure out what standard library functions will give me the value with the correct type + ownership + mutability + lifetime semantics. You just end up in these absurd convoluted scenarios where you have an owned mutable `Option`. You want to unwrap it and mutate the value inside it. Well that's obviously `&a.as_mut().unwrap()`. You want to move the ownership of the contained object but not the optional, that's `.take().unwrap()`, you want ownership of the value and the option, that's `.unwrap()`. You want a non-mutable reference to the interior value that's `&a.as_ref().unwrap()`. And here's the thing—I'm not complaining about explicit move semantics or explicit mutability. I'm talking about poor implementation of those semantics. There should be some convention or language feature where I can go from `get()` to `get_mut` without having to go to the documentation and searching for all hashmap methods that return `&mut`, and having that possibility that there is no `get_mut` and it's impossible to do what I want.

limitation. I have a mutable reference to the HashMap—I can remove the entry, mutate it, and re-insert and I know that. But because the HashMap API designer decided that `.get` returns an immutable reference—nothing else matters. It's Java-level OOP. It's encapsulation. I can't mutate the HashMap except for how the HashMap API designer wanted me to. And that's where I think the promise of the "smart compiler" falls apart—the compiler isn't creating the API, it's not figuring out what's allowed. It's figuring out whether I'm following the rules that were set by the Rust standard library designers. And so all the Rust book examples make sense because they're working with integers. But as soon as you touch the standard library, you have to start rotating through 14 different ways to unwrap an optional. I guess what I'm saying is that the Rust compiler is a borrow-checker, not a borrow-solver.

idea how they want things to work.

"you can't be modifying things willy-nilly in safe rust." And then a couple minutes later he points out there's function to get a mutable reference to a HashMap value. The Rust API is just so huge I just can't wrap my brain around it. Like I'm not good at writing Zig. I'm not smarter at writing Zig code. But the way that Zig is designed, I as the programmer have control over what's going on, and so I figured out how to allocate on the stack and so all of my Zig code is 100% stack allocations—I don't allocate anything on the heap at any point. (Even the Zig functions that do allocations take an allocator, so I can allocate space on the stack and create a fixed buffer allocator for them to use.) But I can't do that in Rust because `HashMap` allocates on the heap and that makes the API more complicated. So instead of creating my own constrains, I need to satisfy all of the standard library API constrains.

To be clear, this has 0 end-user effect: the only people that care are Catppuccin port developers.

at it and notice.

to "take over" the SMASH command-input box in order to provide syntax highlighting and auto completion suggestions. Do you know what API already exists for providing syntax highlighting and auto completion? LSP. I hesitate to commit to supporting LSP because SMASH is not a editor. But if that protocol already exists...

just what programming is like all the time.

only support the most basic of commands, and take it as an opportunity to simplify and iron-out the shell interface. And I'll still do that in some ways. But generally, people know how to use POSIX shells, and solutions provided by POSIX are not bad. The question I'm asking myself is not "could it be better," because it can, but "is it possible to deliver the clean and easy to use terminal experience that I want SMASH to deliver, while still supporting these POSIXs features." And I think the answer is yes for a lot of things, like pipes (which I originally didn't intend on supporting). I think there are other places like some of the quoting rules which may get in the way of delivering an intuitive terminal experience, and so I may need to break compatibility in those areas. Bash is a shell scripting language. It's a whole scripting language. And I don't want the SMASH shell to ever support conditionals or turning complete logic or functions, because it detracts from the status quo of the terminal as a command-entry-screen.

You can trust someone without knowing them. If you have to know someone completely in order to trust them, that’s scicopathic like me.

Like I'm a little impressed it can find it. I'm shocked that it can point me to the right line of the multi-line-string. Again, something that is totally obviously possible, but that is non-trival—someone had to decide to make it work.

This is one of the things that's weird about software. For any piece of software, there's a whole class of features that are possible but are often omitted because they're not 100% necessary. And people will say they're "too difficult" but nothing in software is that much more difficult than anything else. What they mean is that these features aren't 100% necessary and aren't trivial, or aren't possible to implement 100% perfectly. And one of the reasons I'm excited about SMASH is because there are a lot of features I can imagine for a terminal that fall into this category today (using the mouse to move the cursor in the prompt or deleting selected text in the prompt or detecting whether to use control+c to copy or kill the program on Linux or automatically quoting paths with spaces or breaking the output for wrapping on spaces or updating aliases/the prompt without closing and restarting the shell or using command for keyboard shortcuts). But at the same time there are features that are completely possible to implement, like command+f, that I'm very hesitant to implement in SMASH because it doesn't fit with SMASH's UI paradigms, in same way that selecting and deleting text isn't in the paradigm of terminal emulators. But I think you have to make a distinction between "doesn't naturally fit into the existing UX paradigm" and "would compromise the UX paradigm." And so I think allowing command+f is the right call, even though it breaks the prompt-focused guarantee. (Where, for example, links being clickable in the output would compromise the text-only output paradigm.)

a hand in. The book is like, 'The Count is making this guy's life miserable and also, by the way, to really drive home that this guy sucks, his daughter elopes with another woman.' Mlle Eugéngie Danglers, icon. Will continue to post about her.

=> https://thoughts.learnerpages.com/?show=ac730953-47be-4487-ba4f-d96e39b35bf3

understand me and yet react in shock and confusion when I describe how my brain works. I don’t know if I want someone who understands me or someone who doesn’t try to. I’m not afraid of someone knowing me. I’m deeply deeply afraid of someone claiming that they know me. It’s humiliating for someone else to say that they understand what goes on in my head. Because they’re saying that there’s no reason to listen to me and there’s no reason for me to exist.

You should use your time for the things that you value, not value the time itself.

=> https://youtu.be/ybEfflKZ9Oc?t=2400 For context, Victoria hosts Only Connect but is a participant on this episode of Taskmaster.

in your living room. It just doesn't belong. I was flicking through xkcd earlier today, as I do often, and I was thinking about how Randall has put out a lot of comics very consistently, and obviously thinking about this in the context of the Linoleum Club. A lot of the xkcd's are bad, and I think my realization was that, to use the same words as I was using earlier, a lot of the comics don't fit or didn't fit before they were published. And it's obviously easy to look back at XKCD and view it as a comprehensive work, and see that every comic fits because it's there. But some of them I could imagine myself refusing to publish if I was in Randell's shoes because they were too different from the 2,000 comic mean. There are a lot of repetitive sex jokes. #594 is just a single really bad pun. And there are some really good classic comics in that section of XKCD history but I think that's what makes it more brutal. My point is that I would have skipped a day in there. I would have said, "we can't publish #544" because what is it talking about. But Randall didn't, and I don't criticize him for that because on average XKCD is good. So I'm going to shove Alex's puzzle into the Club wholesale, and it's going to be fine, because we can't miss more days and big-picture I'm okay with other people writing puzzles that don't match the tone or difficulty that I would use.

> The magnet-attach bezel is easy to swap and comes in a range of colors The image is only of 3 of the colors.

anyone offers. Like you're describing iTunes Match which is a paid subscription, or you can do it with Apple Music, or with Spotify premium, but there's no world where the DOJ forces Apple to do it for free. And then of course the commenter yesterday who wanted to inspect and clean up the "System Storage" section of his phones storage. Like that is not going to happen here buddy. I get it, you want low-level access to your device. It was super cool for me to SSH into my phone when it was Jailbroken. But I think that's going to stay in the realm of Jailbreaking.

DOJ started preparing the lawsuit in 2019. Ex. third-party default browsers, 15% fee instead of 30% for small developers, etc.

> RIP lala.com, my first and favorite music streaming service - bought out by Apple...As if I needed a reason to further resent Apple. There was a comment that was really interesting about how Apple's issue is that it doesn't have good enough relationships with third-party companies, in particular App developers. And that's a big part of how I see Apple. This isn't about Apple vs. consumers, this is about Apple vs third party developers. The browser engine thing is a good example. You can argue all you want that more choice is inherently better for consumers, but I don't think end-users really care. I'm a web developer and I don't really care. So add on to that that I (as a self-admitted Apple fanboy) think that Apple's web browser is the best. And I don't understand what the angle for end-users is. You can make a similar argument for streaming music services or accessories. Garmin feels wronged because they can't make a watch that replies to texts on an iPhone, but I can reply to texts from my iPhone on my Apple Watch, so I don't feel wronged. And even if a Garmin could reply to texts, I would still buy an Apple Watch. And so Apple is causing harm, and it's causing harm to its competitors. (Whether it's anti-competitive or just hurting them by making better products will be decided by the court.) But a lot of the HN comments seem naive in thinking that this lawsuit is about allowing indie developers to access the file system API or something.

scrollback below it. If you have scrollback above and below it, it locks to the bottom. This is weird because how scrolling works is also weird. I think we allow scroll-past-end, and we do auto-scrolling—the big one is that if you enter a command, that input command won't scroll past the top of the screen. If you scroll-past-end, like when you first open a traditional terminal, the prompt is at the top of screen, but it doesn't lock there. If you enter a command with long output, the prompt gets locked to the bottom while you don't scroll down. If you enter a number of commands with short output, then you're auto-scrolled-down (like a normal terminal), while the prompt is locked to the bottom. The difference is that you can then choose to scroll-past-end, just like in an editor with scroll-past-end.

This is a way to implement/achieve one of the implicit goals of SMASH, which is to be such a good pager that you don't need a dedicated pager. Terminal + shell + pager replacement.

And I guess he was doing similar things, and I either didn't know about them or didn't care or dismissed him as looking for attention. It's easy to look at, Mr. Beast, for example, or a youtuber or influencer who's just gotten popular and starts promoting a charity or advertising their charitable donations as them just trying to continue and expand their publicity. Of course these types of people are donating in public because they're people who love attention and they think donating will get them more attention. But because of where Hank and John are, relative to what else is being done on Youtube and what they've done in the past, it looks more genuine to me today. They're not trying to make themselves look good to people that don't know them; they have an established audience. And they've decided to direct that audience to charitable giving rather than towards "hank and john" NFTs.

vlogbrothers in 2024 and just be blown away by the amount of good that they're doing and how positive the community is.

## Modern Minimalist Software Development Philosophy 1. Release quickly ("rolling release"). 2. Favor code maintainability, in service of 1. 3. Add only essential features, in service of 2. Features lead to complexity, complexity leads to lack of maintainability, lack of maintainability leads to inability to ship fixes, inability to ship fixes allows bugs to thrive.

or calls a read-only function on that variable can introduce a compiler error, by either moving the value out of the variable, or using the variable in a closure with a greater lifetime. It's 100% compile time, so it delivers on the Rust promise in that sense, but it's difficult to reason about the code.

going to be a normal-length 30min one because he apologized for giving us 40 minutes last video. These are the factors you have to consider.

by no means specific to it. You can imagine the same complexities with composing functions in a functional language). Imagine you've been tasked to build a dynamic menu / billing system / ordering system of some sort for a pizza restaurant. You create a Pizza class, which describes a Pizza that the customer might order. It has a size, a price, a list of toppings, methods to ensure that all of the ingredients are in stock, etc. When listing out the menu of available Pizzas, you notice that a huge portion of the menu entries share configuration code describing common dough and cheese options. You, taking the opportunity to DRY your code, create a subclass of Pizza called CheesePizza. This allows you to share the cheese methods and declarations between a large number of your Pizzas. But you can go a step further. A lot of Pizzas have Pepperoni; surely that's a subclass as well. So you can subclass PepperoniPizza from CheesePizza and subclass BBQPizza from Pizza and MeatLoversPizza from PepperoniPizza and so on for every pizza on the menu. A customer then comes in and orders a pepperoni pizza without cheese (as they are lactose intolerant). This isn't a hardcoded class, but your ordering system supports modifications; you can create a PepperoniPizza without cheese. But should you? PepperoniPizza subclasses CheesePizza—the defining feature of which is that it has cheese. Do the methods in CheesePizza work if the pizza doesn't have cheese? Or will they crash your system? What's interesting to me about the problem at this point is that it is totally artificial. It's very clear what the customer wants, and it's not fundamentally difficult to represent in computer memory. If you hadn't done any of your refactoring, it would be very clear how to express this request: a Pizza with pepperoni as its only topping. The solution is to not try to encode data in your type system or class structure or methods or functions or code. If you keep data about the pizza toppings at runtime (or as close to it as possible—you can still hard-code the menu), then your code becomes easier to maintain, despite the fact that it is less modular and uglier. You have every method in the one Pizza class and no method is able to make any assumptions about the underlying data. This is semantic programming. Let your code reflect the semantic complexity of the real-world problem that it is trying to solve. Iterate the options explicitly as data instead of encoding them implicitly as code. A pizza can have any toppings in the real world—it should be able to have any toppings in your code. It's important in modern minimalist software that you avoid this temptation to "simplify the equation" and that you avoid ending up with the most concise, modular, code possible. Many long-lived projects with attentive maintainers fall into this trap. They've been refactored so many times to support the current "menu" that when a customer walks in with a request for a "cheese-free pizza" (or analogous request that the maintainer didn't predict) there's no way to express it and the customer leaves disappointed.

was good; I think that's sufficient.

internet"

but the language is just so complicated that it would take me hours to understand what's going on. You need to understand not just what a move is, but also whether every single data type in your code implements Copy or not. Optional. Result. Mutex. Cell. And all of them have different behaviors. Mutable reference, shared reference. And how do they interact with one another? I don't know.

perfect knowledge. I'm reading documentation on multi-threaded access of a variable but I don't need multi-threaded access. However, I cannot prove to the compiler that I won't have multi-threaded access and so I need to write code like I have multi-threaded access, which can make the documentation difficult to follow.

get the level of detail that I want, but it's not a great choice for extreme level of detail. We'll see how it goes.

from the internet and running it with root permissions and no kernel protections.

> In Rome, I had nearly five thousand volumes in my library. By reading and re-reading them, I discovered that one hundred and fifty books, carefully chosen, give you, if not a complete summary of human knowledge, at least everything that it is useful for a man to know. I devoted three years of my life to reading and re-reading these hundred and fifty volumes, so that when I was arrested I knew them more or less by heart. In prison, with a slight effort of memory, I recalled them entirely. Three comments: 1) what an anthropology and epistemology from the author. What a statement about man and knowledge. 2) Ah, to live 200 years ago when all human knowledge fit in 150 books. No history after Napoleon, no world wars, no cold wars. No atomic or relativistic physics, no electricity, no computer science at all. 3) One of the things that makes this book so fun and effective is that Dumas is willing to write-away stuff like acquiring knowledge, leaving us time to read 100 pages of various characters’ suicidal ideations.

> Discord is being used as a pretty tangible alternative. Conversations that would happen in the Reddit comments can happen in a Discord channel, and many big Discord communities have channels like `#showoff` where people can post bigger projects. There are downsides like the lack of SEO, Reddit-style comment replies, and the upvote algorithm, but there are also advantages like real-time communication and privacy (in that your comments won’t show up in web results years later).

Brennan confirms Chicken Parm is his second favorite food! What happened to 'I love all my children equally,' Brennan???

filesystem (I don't think overlay is the right word, you know what I mean), than it is to allow the package manager to install things at a different location.

> An API client is not venture scale.

I don't expect to nail this, I expect it to be +/- a day. We'll see.

> longest breadstick”. And it’s just a long breadstick that is continuously being added to and baked on a conveyer belt. Then you could cut sections and serve it to customers.

-Song, Sylvan Esso

sortable table on a website. Because making it a website will, and I quote, "reduce the pool of people that will use this." Like I see the vision. This website doesn't need CSS or JS or to be a web app at all. You could go to the page and click a "download Thoughts" button that downloads a native executable that you run that produces a CSV.

control because it wouldn't have the endorsement (in Sublime Text itself) or the financial backing of SublimeHQ covering hosting costs. Wbond doesn't have the time to manage updates to Package Control. Wbond is unwilling to allow anyone else to maintain updates to Package Control while he is hosting it. All reasonable positions on their own, but together they mean that Package Control cannot receive updates.

subset: Why's Poignant Guide to Ruby; RFC 9110.

releasing often (it's minimalist software). Compare to release-early-release-often from Bazaar. Shouldn't have a lot of whack-a-mole if you design your system to be explicit and at times verbose (semantic; pizza example). Components should be independent. (Only end-to-end tests, to avoid solidification of code.) Don't semver; rolling release of bug fixes. Somehow I've never posted the pizza example of semantic/modular design?

* Regularly bulk close tabs

View transcription

> How many things are in the universe? > how many do you want

so solid. Dry on the outside. Supple. I don't know what supple means. With beautiful darker veins. Ah. * Notwithstanding any human selective breeding.

to be able to tell the difference between light blue and white. After 10 minutes screwing with color profiles I've decided my current Dell monitor doesn't have the color range required to display RGB and I need a Studio Display.

jk My Docker container was killed because of tasks happening in a different docker container and Linux OOM Killer on the host is the prime suspect.

you think"

could try to convince me that 2 + 2 = 5 for as long as you want and it's not even stubbornness I'm just right. It doesn't mean I'm not miserable.

executed.

Python `import sys; sys.stdin.read()` Node: I honestly don't know.

The progression from putting his head down and crying after the 2:51 to "well that's a bit silly." "Like who cares" "I'm not crying bro" "This run sucks man" "I won't even submit it" "I'm kidding I'm kidding" "Season 3 boys" (with profanity in between the things I quoted obviously).

disagree with me I’m either being disingenuous or compromising my morals.

Catppuccin Discord server to a Catppuccin theme being merged into the Serenity OS theme repo was a little over 4 hours.

Edit (:46) we went from Ubuntu 20.04 LTS (GNU/Linux 5.13.4-x86_64-linode146 x86_64) to Ubuntu 20.04.6 LTS (GNU/Linux 6.2.9-x86_64-linode160 x86_64)

and we've had several small jumps. And we're not 100% at intelligence, but we're not where we were either. Hofstadter thought that we would invent a method of modeling complex thought and that that computer would be the first computer to solve chess and the first computer to pass the Turing test and the first computer to be conscious. And we've solved chess; we have a computer better at chess than a human, which wasn't the case when GEB the written. And we have a computer (GTP-3 and other LLMs) that can generate text at a human-level (I'm being careful with my wording here, but text generated by GTP-4 is at an adult-human writing-level). And that wasn't the case when GEB was written. (That wasn't the case 3 years ago!) But Hofstadter thought that those problems and AGI (as we would now call it) were the same problems and it's very clear now that they are not.

support PWAs. Edit (Mar 2): I'm also misrepresenting the situation. Firefox requires a third-party extension to support PWAs on desktop.

Might be

yt vtvvytvmv ygtvivm mygtvgvutgfviogvmjuytgiyuv bmjutgykfgvmnvtuyuvu ntyuvfvn vtuyfiu vtyfuv ntyfyuv tyfuv nvuytfuvtuyfu nvtyu nvtyfvvytufmuytjvouytguvo8ygo8yg867g8y9pgf9p8gf97g97g97g079g y8gb 97g97g97gu'[9g 79]g8pyvfgpy8vfuytvcutcu cyc utc ucutcvutyvc7yv yuvc86voyn kpv8yf6yv nkpv8yf6n kpvfy8 y8pftkn pvy nyv 8yvp8vf8vy8vfy8v ky8fgv y8p y86fy ny8p6fy knvyfykvkyvfyifgvkiyvgfkykitvghvgjhvuyfg vyggytvguyvgvhghgvjbuoiuygyttt8yuiglh;lkfghcgy kgugyuipucyguuyuyytcg8797y79;y7gyftyfty88gyc ftfty

The problem is that that I'm better at talking about coding than I am at coding.

One of the issues is that React comparison only works with primitive JS object types, which essentially means you have to work entirely with primitive types with React. Or *hard*-commit to something like Immer and never construct objects without it. Maybe Redux is better; I've never used it. It's just a nightmare.